![]() I have used an override with a magic number to overcome this I'm sure there is a cleaner way to remove the double offset, but I couldn't find it. This offset for the second volta A's is desired, but a double offset for the second volta B's is not. (As seen in your method C) the nested \new Lyrics commands introduce an extra vertical offset to separate the verses. This should give a result like your method D when folded, and like your method B when unfolded. The relevent documentation can be found on this page: lyduration d ++ map lyannotation aa Repeat n x -> repeat, volta. Though volte are best specified using repeat volta, the context property repeatCommands must be used in cases where the volta text needs more advanced formatting with markup. This command is used to specify how a repeated section changes when unfolded it is particularly useful for repeats that aren't exact. LilyPond (lywork ,lyfragment ,lymusicelem ,lyprocess,lyprocesscwd. rp represents a shortening of LilyPond markup by applying the repeat unfold tag around. The Voltaengraver by default resides in the Score context, and brackets for the repeat are thus normally only printed over the topmost staff. You can achieve the structure you want (lyric verses stacked when folded, and yet under the correct measures when unfolded) by using the command: \unfolded. Unfolding a repeated section is no different than writing it out fully. Is it possible Ive spent some time looking a snippets to no avail - it doesnt appear to be a. Is there a way to achieve the result of version B (unfolded) and version D (folded) from the same markup? If not, is there a chance that this will work somehow in the future? Version B would be so intuitive. Id like to get lilypond to produce the ://: mark above the stave used in hymnals (at least) to indicate 'repeat the preceding line of words here' - for an example of what I mean, see the mark above the stave in the first bar of the second page. Is there a better way to achieve version D (folded)? This is the main thing I need and I wanted to know if what I used here could be improved, before using it at a larger scale. % This produces the desired output when folded. ![]() % More logical structure compared to version D, but causes bad alignment. % I would want this to produce output like version D when folded. % This just uses the same structure for lyrics as a voice would. % Setting up lyrics snippets for volta variants. 1 Answer Sorted by: 2 You hit a known problem: see Issue 3688 Manual barlines overwrite repeat barlines. % Works in both the folded and the unfolded version. ![]() % Basic lyrics example with unchanging lyrics. I am currently dealing with a piece of vocal music that has sections which repeat musically but have different lyrics variants for the first and second time of the repeated segments.Ĭonsider the following code, where I have prepared four examples (A–D), each with folded and unfolded repeats: \version "2.24.1"
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |